Search for: "J. C. S.-R."
Results 1 - 20
of 5,446
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Aug 2013, 5:01 pm
Interruption of proceedings[2] R 142(1)(b) provides that:Proceedings before the EPO shall be interrupted … in the event of the applicant (condition A), as a result of some action taken against his property (condition C), being prevented by legal reasons (condition B) from continuing the proceedings.[3] An examination of the question of interruption based on these three conditions A, B and C was developed by the Legal Board in its decisions J 9/94 and… [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 1:19 pm
Meredith S. [read post]
22 Jul 2013, 5:01 pm
The entitlement to file a divisional application according to A 76 and R 25 EPC 1973 is thus a procedural right that derives from the applicant’s status as applicant under the earlier application (J 2/01 [5.1, 6]; J 20/05 [2]). [read post]
13 May 2019, 3:08 am
R. [read post]
8 Oct 2018, 4:55 am
R. [read post]
11 Feb 2012, 10:49 am
C & R Restaurants LLC et al Another BMI case. [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 5:01 pm
Thus, apart from R 30 itself, the Decision of the President of the EPO dated 12 July 2007 concerning the filing of sequence listings (OJ EPO 2007, special edition No. 3, C.1, p. 26) is of relevance. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 7:35 am
R C & Sons Paving, 2011 ME 88 (August 11, 2011), Gorman, J. issued an opinion affirming summary judgment entered against plaintiff Marilyn Davis who was injured when she fell in her employer's icy parking lot. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 11:34 am
Il y a un peu plus d'un an, j'avais signalé la mise en ligne par le blog IPKat d'une décision de la Chambre de recours disciplinaire sur le problème de notation de l'épreuve C 2007. [read post]
27 Nov 2013, 5:01 pm
In the Board’s view, however, there are other situations in which drawings referred to in the description can be said to be missing within the meaning of R 56. [read post]
29 Mar 2007, 5:13 am
Mar. 12, 2007) (Kendall, J.).Judge Kendall denied third party Leo Stoller's motion to intervene pursuant to Fed. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 4:32 am
R. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 4:19 am
J.). [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 10:53 am
WanekSharonda R. [read post]
4 Jul 2012, 3:10 am
Photo (c) Donald J. [read post]
23 Jul 2013, 5:01 pm
The present case can therefore be distinguished from those in G 1/09 and J 4/11 but the principles established by those cases can nevertheless be applied to the present case.[5.1] As to the position immediately after the application was withdrawn and before any request for correction under R 139 was filed, the effect of the filing of the withdrawal was that the application was thereupon withdrawn. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 3:23 pm
Hassan, S. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 10:06 am
Hassan, S. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 3:23 pm
Hassan, S. [read post]
15 Aug 2018, 8:04 pm
Hassan, S. [read post]
